Home  

 

Values of the Australian Workforce 2001

Paul Chippendale, June 2002

Here, I provide a brief update of the changes in the values of the Australian workforce. The earlier article, below, compared the values in the workforce in 1998 with those in 1988. In this brief update, I look at the values in 2001 compared to 1998 and 1988. 

Click on the diagram below to view the values map of the priority values in the Australian workforce as surveyed in 2001.

oz_wf_vba_2001.gif (16662 bytes)
[OZ Workforce Values - 2001]

The table below lists the top ten values in the Australian Workforce in 1988, 1998 and 2001:

1988

1998

2001

  • Management

  • Collaboration/ Subsidiarity

  • Productivity

  • Decision/Initiation

  • Responsibility

  • Rights/Respect

  • Self-Competence/ Confidence

  • Family/Belonging

  • Sharing/Listening/Trust

  • Being Self

  • (Self) Competence/
    Confidence

  • Relaxation

  • Being Self

  • Decision/Initiation

  • Family/Belonging

  • Life/Self-Actualisation

  • Synergy

  • Generosity/Service

  • Loyalty/Fidelity

  • Sharing/Listening/ Trust

  • Relaxation
  • (Self) Competence/ Confidence
  • Being Self
  • Generosity/Service
  • Synergy
  • Decision/Initiation
  • Life/ Self-Actualisation
  • Creativity/Ideation
  • Loyalty/Fidelity

A World-View Shift is Occurring in the Australian Workforce

Paul Chippendale, 2000

Introduction

Values are priorities we hold as a result of how we view the world. They indicate the type of life-style we want to have. For the past 12 years the Values Education Network has been surveying the value priorities of the Australian Workforce. They have noticed a significant shift in value priorities between 1988 and 1998. This means that peoples’ world-views are changing.

This article looks at the values shift that has occurred and discusses implications for management and the formulators of social policy.

The Comparison

A comparison of the top ten values of people in the Australian Workforce in 1988 and 1998 is shown in the table below (The values are listed in order of priority from highest to lowest. Definitions of the values can be found in Appendix A of New Wisdom II):

1988

1998

  • Management

  • Collaboration/Subsidiarity (i.e. ‘getting things done through delegation’ – see the definition in New Wisdom II)

  • Productivity

  • Decision/Initiation

  • Responsibility

  • Rights/Respect

  • Self-Competence/Confidence

  • Family/Belonging

  • Sharing/Listening/Trust

  • Being Self

  • Self-competence/Confidence

  • Relaxation

  • Being Self

  • Decision/Initiation

  • Family/Belonging

  • Life/Self-Actualisation

  • Synergy

  • Generosity/Service

  • Loyalty/Fidelity

  • Sharing/Listening/Trust

 

Interpreting the Values Shift

The 1988 top 10 values indicate that people at that time viewed the ‘world of work’ in a rather traditional light:

  • effective management was most important;

  • ‘you get things done through delegation’;

  • productivity, making decisions and acting on them, taking responsibility for actions, treating each other with respect, and having the competence and confidence to do undertake one’s allocated role – were all key components.

The1998 top 10 values indicate the majority of people in the workplace no longer view the world of work this way – there has been a paradigm shift. The cluster of the top three values (i.e. self-competence/confidence, relaxation and being self) would seem to indicate that, today, people want to develop competencies that are relevant to who they are as a person (i.e. being self) and at their own pace (i.e. relaxation). This interpretation is reinforced by the existence of the value Life/Self-Actualisation in the Top 10 value priorities.

In summary the paradigm shift is:

  • In 1988 people felt compelled to work in order to live as they desired – any work would do, so long as it generated the revenue necessary to create the desired life style.

  • In 1998 people are firstly looking at who they are as a person, and are then seeking to create a life around this – some may view their activities as work, others may not.

Implications for Management

Values are people’s unconscious motivators. In the workplace, effective managers tap into people’s values as a way of motivating them. Clearly, if some managers are operating from the belief that the majority of people still hold the same values priorities they held in 1988, then they will not be effective in motivating their people. To motivate people today, managers will need to allow employees more flexibility in: the hours they work, when they work, and how they work. Gone are the days when people will spend hours engaged in activities they do not enjoy.

Implications for Social Policy Makers

The economic and social policies of the main political parties are constructed around the assumption that there is a strong correlation between income and contentment (Ghazi & Jones 1997, p. 12). The general populace, however, have come to realise that this is not so and are following new multi-faceted strategies to self-fulfilment and happiness.

The political parties who are elected into government in the future will be the ones who tune into the values shift that has occurred in society, and who demonstrate this through formulating their policies around the new value priorities.

References

Colins, C., & Chippendale, P. 1995, New Wisdom II: Values-based Development, Acorn Publications, Brisbane.

Ghazi, P., & Jones, J. 1997, Getting a Life: The Downshifter’s Guide to Happier Simpler Living, Hodder & Stoughton, London.

 

 

 
 

Questions or problems regarding this web site should be directed to our Support Personnel
Website Copyright © 1988-2007 Minessence Group
Ph: 61-7-3803-5809 - Fax: 61-7-3803-5819 -- PO Box 914, SPRING HILL QLD 4004, AUSTRALIA
Last modified: Thursday July 12, 2007